A racist chief rabbi will threaten Israel’s ties with U.S. and U.K. Jews

Ha’aretz 7/9/13

The past few weeks have been a time of great transition for the Modern Orthodox world. In the United Kingdom, the retiring chief rabbi, Lord Jonathan Sacks, published his goodbye message. In the United States, Rabbi Norman Lamm, chancellor of Yeshiva University, stepped down after acknowledging his failure to respond adequately to allegations of sexual abuse against YU rabbis in the 1980s. He published his goodbye letter last week. In Israel, the national-religious community revived its fight to elect Israel’s next chief rabbis, with Rabbi David Stav and Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu apparently garnering the support of most Habayit Hayehudi Knesset members.

These three communities have so much in common that they are often mistaken as the same. If you were to draw a Venn diagram, the Modern Orthodox communities of the United Kingdom and United States, and the national-religious community in Israel would greatly overlap. The common thread that combines them, however, is at risk of snapping if Eliyahu is indeed elected to become Israel’s chief Sephardi rabbi. His election, supported by the national-religious community, would demonstrate a fundamental rejection of both of the ideologies that the U.K. and U.S. Modern Orthodox communities hold dear. To understand how, we must look at what drives each of these communities.

Modern Orthodox mensches

Though a diverse crowd, if one had to find the defining concept at the heart of Anglo-Jewry’s Orthodox (but not ultra-Orthodox) community, it would be “Derech eretz kadma la’Torah.” This was the lesson of Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch, the late 19th Century rabbi in Germany, and roughly translates to manners (or behaving well) proceeds the Torah. Being polite, or, using the Yiddish term, being a mensch, is a necessary prerequisite to fulfilling the Torah. The literal translation of the term is “the ways of the land come before the Torah.” Understanding what it is to be an upstanding member of society comes part in parcel of being a G-d-fearing Jew.

This ideology can be seen in Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks’ writings and particularly in his last publication, “A Judaism Engaged in the World.” Critiquing both assimilation and segregation of the ultra-Orthodox, Sacks makes a passionate case for an Orthodox community that can fulfill its mission as a light unto the nations.

Sanctify the secular

In the United States, the ideology behind Modern Orthodoxy is Torah Umaddah, Torah and secular knowledge. Embodied by Yeshiva University, its great figure was Rabbi Dr. Joseph B. Soloveitchik, commonly known as The Rav. The belief that one could enhance their understanding of the Torah through the study of secular knowledge alongside that of the Torah is at the heart of Yeshiva University and all of its rabbinical graduates.

Rabbi Norman Lamm, perhaps the leader of this ideology today, spoke about the need to sanctify the secular and understand the liminal space between the secular and the holy. Life is complex for Modern-Orthodox Jews, but worth living.

Serve G-d and the state

The national-religious community in Israel focuses on serving G-d and the state. When I was in Hesder Yeshiva in Israel, I was told that for Jews from abroad there was the Rav (Rabbi Solovetichik). In Israel there was the Rov (Rabbi Abraham Ha’Cohen Kook). Rav Kook’s ideology of the holiness of the land, the concept of redemption through the state, and G-d’s will happening through those who are not religious are some of the main concepts behind the national religious. The religious Zionism he championed can best be summed up in the B’nei Akiva slogan, “Torah Ve’avoda,” roughly translated as “Torah and work.” In the 1920’s this work was on kibbutzim, but today can be seen as contributing to the state.

The knitted kippa-wearing public of all three communities all share parts of each other’s foundations. At 18 years old, Modern Orthodox Jews from the United Kingdom and United States go to Israel for their gap years and often study in yeshiva or seminary. Religious olim bring to Israel the values and ideologies of their home communities. British rabbinical students attend Yeshiva University and the chief rabbi is a revered figure in the United States. The endorsed figures for the Chief Rabbinate in Israel, however, could present significant challenges to the interconnections of these communities.

Rabbi David Stav shares many of the values and understandings as members of both the British and American Modern Orthodox communities. Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, shares few – if any.

His legacy of racism and incitement to violence stands as an anathema to the values of what are the two sister communities in the Diaspora. If elected, he should not be welcomed nor hosted in any Modern Orthodox community abroad. It truly would be a stain on the values of the Modern Orthodox and the national religious for him to be selected.

The progressive streams of Judaism have made their voices heard when it has come to the Women of the Wall protests and successes. The ultra-Orthodox have marched in New York against reforming the Tal law. Now, Modern Orthodox Jews of the Diaspora need to make it clear that a racist chief rabbi of Israel will not be accepted or welcomed anywhere.


2 thoughts on “A racist chief rabbi will threaten Israel’s ties with U.S. and U.K. Jews

  1. what you have just done is be mzazel a rabbi in public. that is loshon hora, he is not a racist rather a proud jew who is trying to prevent intermarriage in tzfat and places like this. the diaspora rabbi’s that you mentioned have to be more cool headed because they are IT THE DIASPORA. a few years ago Rabbi Jonathan Sacks ruled that one can go in to a hindu temple as it is not a place of idol worship. when i was still in cardiff I visited a hindu temple and it is very much idol worship so why does he poskun differently because he is a rabbi of an exile community who has to take in to account more than just dry halacha. What you said of Rav Kook is also not correct, any Rabbi who believes in the Jewish nation as the chosen people and the most holy people in the world would definitely be considered racist in the eyes of most non-Jews. Jewish girls are at risk of intermarriage in many cities in Israel and he is just trying to actively prevent that. One of the calls for continued aliyah is because of the demographic fact that it is almost impossible to intermarry here, yet the risks are increasing and he is just trying to prevent that. I personally do not understand how it is possible that you are writing articles from the ivory tower of america about our situation here, you think it should be different then be here. The reality on the ground is very different from the way you are analyzing. also you speak of the rov = rav kook and the rav = rav soloveitchik when it is actually the opposite. One side of Rav Kook which you have chose to ignore is his fight over jewish land being kept in jewish hands (for sure racist by the way you explained it). you have also not mentioned that Rav Kook and those who follow his path are almost all opponents of a two state plan (something seen as racist by the vast majority of countries). Another issue that you haven’t broached is the issue that Rav Kook was very open and sometimes publicly calling for a cherem on jewish kibbutzim that were opening on shabbat for agricultural activities. Apart from all my comments until now my first comment is the first, just as I am not bad mouthing rabbis in america a diaspora jew should not be bad mouthing israeli rabbis, no matter how racist they are in your eyes you can not begin to understand the challenges he’s up against and how he is trying to preserve the jewish majority in israel even if that means calling to sell houses to Jews only. I didn’t realise preventing intermarriage is a racist offence today. one last point, IT IS LOSHON HORA TO DISGRACE A RABBI.

    • Joshua you make a lot of points here but will answer what I feel is the main one. I have no right to criticize Rabbi Eliyahu because he is a rabbi and intermarriage is a big issue in Israel.

      Rabbi eliyahu is a state official and therefore has public responsibility and the ability to be publicly criticized. Even the Israeli attorney general’s office has opened a file on his racist statements. You cannot as a state official racially segregate housing nor are you allowed to incite to violence like he did in the 90’s.

      You say you are worried about intermarriage (something that is a far bigger threat in the diaspora rather then israel btw). You answer that with education and Jewish Identity not through legislation. You cannot force something like that. Indeed to force it is racist and I will call it as I see it.

      You don’t like the fact that I am commenting from Brooklyn, fine you think the Diaspora has no role good for you. I disagree and the Jewish people are a complex tapestry that need each other. I have been a constant proponent of the Diaspora to respect Israel and vis a versa.

      Having Semicah does not entitle you to be free from all criticism and yes it is racist to say that citizens of the same country cannot live in the same building. You care about intermarriage then worry about Jewish education not segregation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s